Fully managed end to end HA solutions
Fully managed end to end HA solutions
Rest of the Industry
Hight Availability Solutions
Real Time Alerts Monitoring
Custom Function Development
MeghHA Vs Pacemaker/Corosync
- Application service recovery is 6 times faster with MeghHA as compared to Pacemaker/corosync
- Application outage time is 15 times lesser with MeghHA as compared to Pacemaker/corosync
- Application fault detection is 32 times faster with MeghHA as compared to Pacemaker/corosync
- Application repair is 5 times faster with MeghHA as compared to Pacemaker/corosync
- Mean CPU usage is 120 times lesser with MeghHA as compared to Pacemaker/corosync
- Memory usage is 6 times lesser with MeghHA as compared to Pacemaker/corosync
- Network Bandwidth usage during download is 53 times lesser with MeghHA as compared to Pacemaker/corosync
- Network Bandwidth usage during upload is 9 times lesser with MeghHA as compared to Pacemaker/corosync
MeghHA Vs Other SAF based implementations
Features |
MeghHA |
SAFplus |
SAFfire |
SelfReliant |
Five nines of availability |
|
|
|
|
100% Service Continuity |
|
|
|
|
Based on open standards (Service Availability Forum) |
|
|
|
|
Development and sustenance support |
|
|
Oracle has stopped support since 2018 |
Easy Scale-in / Scale-out support |
|
|
|
|
Ease of integration |
|
|
|
|
Cloud feature support (Container, Split-brain, VM Migration, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
Fits broadest set of HA cases (eliminating special case solutions for each system) |
|
|
|
|
Centralized alarms and notifications dashboard, monitoring multi-clusters with MeghHA Dashboard integration |
|
|
|
|
Fully Managed Service |
|
|
|
|
MeghHA Vs Kubernetes
Features |
MeghHA |
Kubernetes |
Container Support |
|
|
Easy Scale-in / Scale-out support |
|
|
Muti-Cluster Resource Monitoring Support |
|
|
Up to Five Nines (99.999%) of availability for mission/business critical applications |
|
|
100% Service Continuity using Checkpoint, Message and Event Services |
|
|
Applications Alarms & Notification Support |
|
|